- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- Dell Has Some Explaining to Do
- Dell May Start to Show Some Promise
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Intel's Andy Bryant Offers An Explanation
- Apple's Global Retail Invasion
- Intel Settles; AMD Settles the Score
MOST SHARED
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- Paul: Audit the Fed
- Existing-Home Sales Jump To Highest Level in 2-1/2 Years
- TV Retailer QVC Joins 'Black Friday' Frenzy
- Buffett's Wealth and Fame Hasn't Helped 'Warren' As a Name
- Madoff—The Holiday Drink
- China Asks Its Banks to Slow Down
- Nov. 23: Unusual Volume Leaders
- Start-Up Proves Everything Really Is Better With Bacon
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- 9 Stocks That Play Rising Water Costs: Strategists
- Weis' Deal Likely Won't Change Big Money Contracts
- Gold Prices Can Double in 3 Years: Portfolio Manager
- Nov. 23: Unusual Volume Leaders
- Help Wanted—Please Run $4 Billion University
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- Rally Could 'Have Some Legs in 2010': Market Strategist
- Investors May Skew Housing Reality
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- Why the Dollar Will Likely Stay Weak for Some Time
- Wall Street 'Bonuses' Disappear—but Only in Name
- Bear, Lehman Execs Weren't Wiped Out by Crisis: Study
- How Real Estate Investors Skew Housing's Reality
- Vioxx Showed Risk Signs Before Being Pulled: Report
- Even Buffett's Huge Fame Can't Help the Name 'Warren'
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- JPMorgan's Dimon Could Succeed Geithner: Report
RSS FEED
Tech Check
![]() |
So when a company like Palm, whose issues are largely its own, decides to cut back and reorganize, it's hardly headline-grabbing.
But what could be worth an investor's second glance is a note out this morning from Pablo Perez-Fernandez, the wireless analyst at Global Crown Capital. Not only is he downgrading shares this morning to a "Sell," he suggests that Palm's single biggest investor, the venture capital firm Elevation Partners, may be looking to unload its stake in Palm. If that were to happen, it could be the beginning of the end of this company.
In his note this morning, Perez-Fernandez chides the company's strategy to pay a one-time, $900 million dividend to engineer Elevation's 25 percent stake for $325 million made no sense then, and is even more difficult to swallow today, given the company's current financial straits. He asks, "We would like to know whose idea it was to take on $400 million in debt to pay out a $900 million, one-time dividend so that Elevation's $325 million investment would equal roughly 25 percent of Palm?" He adds that the company today has a negative $140 million in net cash, and could burn at least $80 million to $100 million over the next four quarters. And that grim outlook at a time when he says it's next to impossible to raise new capital.
Perez-Fernandez throws it out there that Elevation might divest, but he offers nothing concrete to support the claim. It's reasonable, he tells me, given the circumstances, though he also tells me hasn't gotten any specific information from Elevation on this front. He says Palm's decision to launch a shelf registration on Nov. 3 because the company is so desperate for cash, will significantly dilute the shares, and the company risks a change in control because of that dilution. Under the rules of the Elevation deal, Palm is required to offer to buy back Elevation's stake at a premium of 1 percent to 5 percent. Elevation, he thinks, would jump at the chance to get out. I sent an email to Elevation's managing partner Roger McNamee this morning seeking some guidance, but I haven't heard back.
Perez-Fernandez's report follows my examination of the company's "curious" decision in August to release a $549 Treo Pro with no US carrier support. CEO Ed Colligan sat down with me around that time to make the claim that the stunningly high price would be easily absorbed by IT managers more interested in using the phone on the carrier of its choice, rather than being tied to the carrier of Palm's choice. Flexibility comes at a cost, he reasoned, but it would be a cost corporate customers would eagerly pay. I posited then that the assumption sounded more like strategic window-dressing; that it was more likely that Palm simply had difficulty getting manufacturing costs low enough that a carrier could cost-effectively subsidize it. That would be devastating. And it seems to be the case.
And while Palm's flagship phone continues to languish, we're seeing Apple's [AAPL
Loading...
()
] 3G iPhone continue to fly off store shelves; we see the new Bold and Storm from Research in Motion [RIMM
Loading...
()
] continuing to enjoy the spotlight. All of them are at price-points at $299 or below.
Palm seems to be at serious risk of becoming a smart-phone also-ran, an asterisk to an otherwise dynamic sector that continues to push innovation and capability. In my several interviews with Colligan over this past year, he has always made the compelling argument that the smartphone market is just beginning and that there is clearly enough growth to support multiple success stories. I'd agree. But those success stories seem to be building around RIM and Apple and Nokia,[NOK
Loading...
()
] while Palm continues to grasp for growth just outside its reach.
Perez-Fernandez takes Colligan to task, reminding investors he has had "very little success" turning companies around, and while the company still has trouble getting its newest mobile operating system out the door (two years late and counting), it's being passed by Apple's mobile OS X, Android S60 from Google[GOOG
Loading...
()
], even Microsoft's[MSFT
Loading...
()
] Mobile Windows. Global Crown suggests this holiday season will mark the beginning of the end for Palm. With a stock around $2, down from over $8 in October, it would seem investors are not so reluctantly agreeing.
Questions? Comments?








